GMAT机经,2017年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五).

2017-08-10 作者： 35阅读

以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!

以下澳际留学独家整理发布2011年GMAT机经，以下2011年5月GMAT作文机经，AI篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月15日，共42题。澳际留学祝同学们GMAT考试顺利！

29. 本月3次

讲emploee是否have right to design their workplace

上月机经6次

因为physical work environment 可以增强 employee的productivity，所以employees should have the rights to decide how is their workplace designed.

原题：“Since the physical work environment affects employee productivity and morale, the employees themselves should have the right to decide how their workplace is designed.”(68)

提供观点：

1. brings creativity and coziness

2. makes colleagues more closely and companionate

3. Admittedly, some companies such as consulting/consultant? company must avoid too much decoration. However, no matter the employee or the employer, as for the environment is considered, compromise should be made from time to time.

View1: work character has great influence on the design of workplace.

Evidence: consulting company must avoid too much decoration in order to appear professionally and dependably. To some creative work such as AD agency and fashion design, the decorating of workplace is important not only for simulating inspirations but also for showing creative abilities.

View2: also, the designment of workplace should be compromise to company culture.

Evidence: Consider the influence it has done to co-workers and the harmony in work place.

北美范文：

I agree that physical workspace can affect morale and productivity and that, as a result, employees should have a significant voice in how their work areas are designed. However, the speaker suggests that each employee should have full autonomy over his or her immediate workspace, I think this view is too extreme, for it ignores two important problems that allowing too much freedom over workspace (工作区；工作空间) can create.

On the one hand, I agree that some aspects of workspace design are best lt to the individual prerences of each worker. Location of personal tools and materials, style and size of desk chair, and even desk lighting and decorative desk items, can each play an important role in a worker’s comfort, psychological wellbeing, concentration, and ficiency. Moreover, these features involve highly subjective prerences, so it would be inappropriate for anyone but the worker to make such choices.

On the other hand, control over one’s immediate workspace should not go unchecked, for two reasons. First, one employee’s workspace design may inconvenience (v. to subject to inconvenience: put to trouble), annoy, or even offend nearby coworkers. For example, pornographic pinups ([钉在墙上的]偶像，偶像照片[例如裸体女人或影星、歌星的照片]) may distract some coworkers and offend others, thereby impeding productivity, fostering ill-will and resentment, and increasing attrition—all to the detriment of the company. Admittedly, the consequences of most workspace choices would not be so far-reaching. Still, in my observation many people adhere, consciously or not, to the adage that one person’s rights extend only so far as the next person’s nose (or ears. or eyes). A second problem with affording too much workspace autonomy occurs when workspaces are not clearly delineated—by walls and doors—or when workers share an immediate workspace. In such cases, giving all workers concurrent authority would perpetuate conflict and undermine productivity.

In conclusion, although employees should have the freedom to arrange their work areas, this freedom is not absolute. Managers would be well-advised to arbitrate workspace disputes and, if needed, assume authority to make final decisions about workspace design.

30. 本月5次

A leader can be accepted only if he or she demonstrates the abilityto perform the same task he or she expects others to perform.

上月机经5次

原题：“People are likely to accept as a leader only someone who has demonstrated an ability to perform the same tasks that he or she expects others to perform.”（33）

提供观点：

1. 人们不会尊重一个不能完成他要求别人完成的任务自己却不能完成的领导。这是人之常情，人们通常都只会欣赏和尊敬比自己优秀的人，而不喜欢被一个不能完成任务却命令自己去做的人心存敬意。例如克林顿总统当commander-in-chi 的时候，由于众所周知他曾经逃避兵役，很自然的下级军官和士兵都不是很尊重他。

2. 人们不信任一个自己完不成任务却要求别人去完成的人。仍然举克林顿总统的例子。由于他逃兵役被视为没有能力，下级都对他的决策心存怀疑，这也就潜在的导致了执行上的不尽心不尽力。

3. 诚然是否能完成自己交给别人的任务并不是衡量一个leader重要指标。可能领导能力、,组织能力、运筹能力更为重要，但是我们不能忽视人们心理上的看法，尽管它可能并不合理但它确实是存在的。

normal human feelings admire adore respect superior to evade escape military service subordinate soldier be doubtful of be suspicious of execution implement admittedly true potentially evaluate index leadership psychological psychology psychologic psychologist exist subsist ...in ... serves as a fitting and public example

1. 诚然，如果在其领导的领域内几乎一窍不通，一个领导很难得到下属的信任和支持，会被看作layperson. 比如，人们无法想象一个不具备任何电脑知识的人，该如何领导一个庞大的IT企业，比如MICROSOFT在激烈的市场中竞争。

2. 但是，这是否意味着作为领导，必须要有能力完成每一项他要求下属做的事呢？这个问题，与领导和员工的真正作用有很大关系！首先，领导的职责是制定长期的发展方针，并且保证这个方针的贯彻执行，adhere to their strategic plans不被偏离。组织员工共同合作完成任务。on the other hand, 员工的作用是各司其职，更加具体的specific task.

3. 从以上两种职责不难看出，领导与员工起到significantly different functions，让领导完成每一个subordinate要做的工作，unfair的。比如，不能blame a CEO for lacking the skills of typing。要对下属做的事有很好的了解，但不一定都要做。否则，领导就失去了意义，成为了一个全能的工人。omnipotent worker with all kinds of skills.

View1: It is human nature to admire then follow someone who is more competent than themselves.

View2: But a feature of a good leader is to organize people with different specialities together and let them perform as a whole. It is too ideal to expect the leaders to have all the specialities of his subordinates.

北美范文：

People are more likely to accept the leadership of those who have shown they can perform the same tasks they require of others. My reasons for this view involve the notions of respect and trust.

It is difficult for people to fully respect a leader who cannot, or will not, do what he or she asks of others. President Clinton’s difficulty in his role as Commander-in-Chi (n. 总司令) serves as a fitting and very public example. When Clinton assumed this leadership position, it was well known that he had evaded military service during the Vietnam conflict. Military leaders and lower-level personnel alike made it clear that they did not respect his leadership as a result. Contrast the Clinton case with that of a business leader such as John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems, who by way of his training and experience as a computer engineer earned the respect of his employees.

It is likewise difficult to trust leaders who do not have experience in the areas under their leadership. The Clinton example illustrates this point as well. Because President Clinton lacked military experience, people in the armed forces found it difficult to trust that his policies would rlect any understanding of their interests or needs. And when put to the test, he undermined their trust to an even greater extent with his naive and largely bungled attempt to solve the problem of gays (<美俚> 同性恋者, 尤指男性同性者) in the military. In stark contrast, President Dwight Eisenhower inspired nearly devotional trust as well as respect because of his role as a military hero in World War II.

In conclusion, it will always be difficult for people to accept leaders who lack demonstrated ability in the areas under their leadership. Initially, such leaders will be regarded as outsiders, and treated accordingly. Moreover, some may never achieve the insider status that inspires respect and trust from those they hope to lead.

以上澳际留学为大家收集整理发布2011年GMAT机经，以上2011年5月GMAT作文机经，AI篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月15日，共42题。澳际留学祝同学们考试顺利！

以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!

GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)GMAT机经,2011年5月GMAT作文机经AI(至5.15)(十五)

以下GMAT机经为澳际留学独家整理，转载请注明出处，若无注明发现必究!

以下澳际留学独家整理发布2011年GMAT机经，以下2011年5月GMAT作文机经，AI篇，2011年5月3日至2011年5月15日，共42题。澳际留学祝同学们GMAT考试顺利！

29. 本月3次

讲emploee是否have right to design their workplace

上月机经6次

因为physical work environment 可以增强 employee的productivity，所以employees should have the rights to decide how is their workplace designed.