gmat作文备考之范文23篇(下).

2017-08-11 作者： 54阅读

　　对于很多备考gmat的人来说，在准备gmat作文考试的时候，往往需要提前参考一些范文来丰富自己的gmat作文写作经验，下面就来看看在gmat备考中，需要准备的一些gmat作文范例分享。

　　13. "The people we remember best are the ones who broke the rules. "

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.(统一和分歧)

　　I strongly agree that rule-breakers are the most memorable people. By departing from the status quo, iconoclasts call attention to themselves, some providing conspicuous mirrors for society, others serving j as our primary catalysts for progress.

　　In politics, for example, rule-breakers Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King secured prominent places in history by challenging the status quo through civil disobedience. Renegades such as Ghengu Khan. Stalin, and Hussein, broke all the human rights "rules," thereby leaving indelible marks in f historical record. And future generations will probably remember Nixon and Kennedy more clearly than Carter or Reagan, by way of their rule-breaking activities-specifically, Nixon&aposs Watergate debacle and Kennedy&aposs extra-marital trysts.

　　In the arts, mavericks such as Dali, Picasso, and Warhol, who break established rules of composition, ultimately emerge as the greatest artists, while the names of artists with superior technical skills are relegated to the footnotes of art-history textbooks. Our most influential popular musicians are the flagrant rule breakers-for example, be-bop musicians such as Charlie Parker and Thelonius Monk, who broke all the harmonic rules, and folk musician-poet Bob Dylan, who broke the rules for lyrics.

　　In the sciences, innovation and progress can only result from challenging conventional theories, i.e., by breaking rules. Newton and Einstein, for example, both rused to blindly accept what were perceived at their time as certain "rules" of physics. As a result, both men redined those rules, and both men emerged as two of the most memorable figures in the field of physics.

　　In conclusion, it appears that the deepest positive and negative impressions appear on either side of the same iconoclastic coin. Those who leave the most memorable imprints in history do so by challenging norms, traditions, cherished values, and the general status quo, that is, by breaking the rules.

　　14. Although "genius" is difficult to dine, one of the qualities of genius is the ability to transcend traditional modes of thought and create new ones.

　　Explain what you think the above statement means and discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this dinition of genius. In your discussion, be sure to include at least one example of someone who, in your opinion, exemplifies genius or a particular characteristic of genius. (统一和分歧)

　　I strongly agree that true genius is the ability to see beyond conventional modes of thinking and to suggest new and better ones. This dinition property sets genius apart from lesser instances of critical acumen, inventiveness or creativity. Under this dinition, a true genius must successfully (I) challenge the assumptions underlying a current paradigm, and (2) supplant the old paradigm with a new, better, and more fruitful one.

　　This two-pronged standard for true genius is aptly illustrated by examining the scientific contribution of the century astronomer Copernicus. Prior to Copernicus, our view of the universe was governed by the Ptolemaic paradigm of a geocentric universe, according to which our earth was in a fixed position I at the center of the universe, with other heavenly bodies revolving around it. Copernicus challenged | this paradigm and its key assumptions by introducing a distinction between real motion and motion that s merely apparent. In doing so, he satisfied the first requirement of a true genius.

　　|ad Copernicus managed to show only that the old view and its assumptions were problematic, we would not consider him a genius today. Copernicus went on, however, to develop a new paradigm; he &apos claimed that the earth is rotating while hurtling rapidly through space, and that other heavenly bodies only appear to revolve around the earth. Moreover, he reasoned that his view about the earth&aposs real motion could explain the apparent motion of the sun, stars and other planets around the earth. It turned out he was right; and his theories helped facilitate Galileo&aposs empirical observations, Kepler&aposs laws of planetary motion, and Newton&aposs gravitational principle.

　　To sum up, I find the proposed dinition of true genius incisive and accurate; and the example of Copernicus aptly points up the two required elements of true genius required by the dinition.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

　　15. Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society&aposs past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes.

　　In your opinion, which is more important-preserving historic buildings or encouraging modern development? Explain your position, using reasons and examples based on your own experiences, observations, or reading. (新与旧)

　　The issue of whether to raze an old, historic building to make way for progress is a complex one, since it involves a conflict between our interest in preserving our culture, tradition, and history and a legitimate need to create practical facilities that serve current utilitarian purposes. In my view, the final judgment should depend on a case-by-case analysis of two key factors.

　　One key factor is the historic value of the building. An older building may be worth saving because it uniquely represents some bygone era. On the other hand, if several older buildings represent the era just as fectively, then the historic value of one building might be negligible. If the building figured centrally into the city&aposs history as a municipal structure, the home of a founding family or other significant historical figure, or the location of important events, then its historic value would be greater than if its history was an unremarkable one.

　　The other key factor involves the specific utilitarian needs of the community and the relative costs and benits of each alternative in light of those needs. For example, if the need is mainly for more office space, then an architecturally appropriate add-on or annex might serve just as well as a new building. On the other hand, an expensive retrofit may not be worthwhile if no amount of retrofitting would permit it to serve the desired function- Moreover, retrofitting might undermine the historic value of the old building by altering its aesthetic or architectural integrity.

　　In sum, neither modernization for its own sake nor indiscriminate preservation of old buildings should guide decisions in the controversies at issue. Instead, decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis) considering historic value, community need, and the comparative costs and benits of each alternative.

　　16. "It is difficult for people to achieve professional success without sacrificing important aspects of a fulfilling personal life."

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion slated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (理想和现实)

　　Are professional success and a fulfilling personal life mutually exclusive? Probably not, although it is more difficult today to achieve both.

　　Undeniably, today&aposs professionals must work long hours to keep their heads above water, let alone to get ahead in life financially. This is especially true in Japan, where cost of living, coupled with corporate culture, compel professional males to all but abandon their families and literally to work &aposthemselves to death. While the situation here in the states may not be as critical, the two-income family is now the norm, not by choice but by necessity.

　　However, our society&aposs professionals are taking steps to remedy the problem. First, they are inventing ways such as job sharing and telecommuting to ensure that personal life does not take a back seat to career. Second, they are setting priorities and living those hours outside the workplace to their fullest. In fact, professional success usually requires the same time-management skills that are usul to find time for family, hobbies, and recreation. One need only look at the recent American presidents-Clinton, Bush, Reagan and Carter- to see that it is possible to lead a balanced life which includes time for family, hobbies, and recreation, while immersed in a busy and successful career. Third, more professionals are changing careers to ones which allow for some degree of personal fulfillment and self-actualization. Besides, many professionals truly love their work and would do it without compensation, as a hobby. For them, professional and personal fulfillments are one and the same.

　　In conclusion, given the growing demands of career on today&aposs professionals, a fulfilling personal life remains possible-by working smarter, by setting priorities, and by making suitable career choices.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

　　17. "The most fective way for a businessperson to maximize profits over a long period of time is to follow the highest standards of ethics. "

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (各个领域间的交流)

　　Some people claim that following high ethical standards is the best way to maximize profits in the long run. However, this claim seems to be more of a normative statement than an empirical observation. The issue is more complex than the speaker suggests. In my observation, the two objectives at times coincide but at other times conflict.

　　In many ways behaving ethically can benit a business. Ethical conduct will gain a company the kind of good reputation that earns repeat business. Treating suppliers, customers and others fairly is likely to result in their reciprocating. Finally, a company that treats its employees fairly and with respect will gain their loyalty which, in turn, usually translates into higher productivity.

　　On the other hand, taking the most ethical course of action may in many cases reduce profits, in the short run and beyond. Consider the details of a merger in which both firms hope to profit from a synergy gained thereby. If the details of the merger hinge on the ethical conviction that as few employees as possible should lose their jobs, the key executives may lose sight of the fact that a leaner, , less labor-intensive organization might be necessary for long-term survival. Thus, undue concern with ethics in this case would result in lower profits and perhaps ultimate business failure.

　　This merger scenario points out a larger argument that the speaker misses entirely-that profit maximization is per se the highest ethical objective in private business. Why? By maximizing profits, businesses bestow a variety of important benits on their community and on society: they employ more people, stimulate the economy, and enhance healthy competition. In short, the profit motive is the key to ensuring that the members of a free market society survive and thrive. While this argument might ignore implications for the natural environment and for socio-economic justice, it is a compelling argument nonetheless.

　　Thus the choice to follow high ethical standards should not be made by thinking that ethical conduct is profitable. While in some cases a commitment to high ethical standards might benit a company financially, in many cases it will not. In the final analysis, businesses might best be advised to view their attempts to maximize profits as highly ethical behavior in itself.

　　18. "Everywhere, it seems, there are clear and positive signs that people are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences. "

　　In your opinion, how accurate is the view expressed above? Use reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading to develop your position. (统一和分歧)

　　In determining whether we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences, one must examine overt actions and underlying motives, as well as examining whether our differences are increasing or decreasing. The issue, therore, is quite complex, and the answer is unclear.

　　Disrespect for one another&aposs differences manifests itself in various forms of prejudice and discrimination. Since the civil rights arid feminist movements of the 60s and 70s, it would seem that we have made significant progress toward eliminating racial and sexual discrimination. Antidiscriminatory laws in the areas of employment housing, and education, now protect all significant minority groups-racial minorities and women, the physically challenged and, more recently, homosexuals. Movies and television shows, which for better or worse have become the cynosure of our cultural attention, now tout the rights of minorities, encouraging acceptance of and respect for others.

　　However much of this progress is forced upon us legislatively. Without Title 10 and its progenies, would we voluntarily rrain from the discriminatory behavior that the laws prevent? Perhaps not. Moreover, signs of disrespect are all around us today. Extreme factions still rally around bigoted | demagogues; the number of "hate crimes" is increasing alarmingly; and school-age children seem to ^flaunt a disrespect toward adults as never bore. Finally, what appears to be respect for one another&aposs differences may in fact be an increasing global homogeneity-mat is, we are becoming more and more Hike.

　　In sum, on a societal level it is difficult to distinguish between genuine respect for one another&aposs differences on the one hand and legislated morality and increasing homogeneity on the other. Accordingly, the claim that we are becoming more respectful of one another&aposs differences is somewhat dubious.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

　　19. "What is the final objective of business? It is to make the obtaining of a living- the obtaining of food, clothing, shelter, and a minimum of luxuries-so mechanical and so little time-consuming that people shall have time for other things."--A business leader, circa 1930

　　Explain what you think the quotation above means and discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the view of business it expresses. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　The arguer suggests that the ultimate purpose of business is to streamline and mechanize work, thereby minimizing it, so that people can make a living but still have time for other things in life. The assumptions behind this view of business are that the value of work is entirely instrumental, and that our work lives are distinct from the rest of our lives. I disagree with both assumptions.

　　Admittedly, work is to a large extent instrumental in that we engage in it to provide for our basic needs while leaving time and resources for other activities-raising families, participating in civic life, traveling, pursuing hobbies, and so forth. And these activities normally take place away from the workplace and are distinct from our work. However, for most people, work is far more than a means to these ends. It can also be engaging, enjoyable and fulfilling in itself. And it can provide a context for expressing an important part of one&aposs self. However, work will be less of all these to the extent that it is streamlined and mechanized for quick disposal, as the quotation recommends. Instead, our jobs will become monotonous and tedious, the work of drones. And we might become drone-like in the process.

　　In addition, work can to some extent be integrated with the rest of our lives. More and more companies are installing on-site daycare facilities and workout rooms. They are giving greater attention to the ambiance of the breakroom, and they are sponsoring family events, excursions and athletic activities for employees as never bore. The notion behind this trend is that when a company provides employees with ways to fulfill outside needs and desires, employees will do better work. I think this idea has merit.

　　In conclusion, I admit that there is more to life than work, and that work is to some extent a means to i provide a livelihood. But to suggest that this is the sole purpose of business is an oversimplification that ignores the self-actualizing significance of work, as well as the ways it can be integrated with other aspects of our lives.

　　20. "What education fails to teach us is to see the human community as one. Rather than focus on the unique differences that separate one nation from another, education should focus on the similarities among all people and places on Earth."

　　What do you think of the view of education expressed above? Explain, using reasons and/or specific examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (同一与分歧)

　　This view seems to recommend that schools stress the unity of all people instead of their diversity. While I agree that education should include leaching students about characteristics that we all share, doing so need not necessarily entail shifting focus away from our differences. Education can and should include both.

　　On the one hand, we are in the midst of an evolving global community where it is increasingly important for people to recognize our common humanity, as well as specific hopes and goals we all share. People universally prer health to disease, being nourished to starving, safe communities to crime-riddled ones, and peace to war. Focusing on our unity will help us realize these hopes and goals. Moreover, in ear pluralistic democracy it is crucial to find ways to unify citizens from diverse backgrounds. Otherwise, we risk being reduced to ethnic, religious or political factions at war with one another, as witnessed recently in the former Yugoslavia. Our own diverse society can forestall such horrors only if citizens are educated about the democratic ideals, heritage, rights and obligations we all have in common.

　　On the other hand, our schools should not attempt to erase, ignore, or even play down religious, ethnic or cultural diversity. First of all, schools have the obligation to teach the democratic ideal of tolerance. And the best way to teach tolerance is to educate people about different religions, cultures and so on. Moreover, educating people about diversity might even produce a unifying fect-by promoting understanding and appreciation among people from all backgrounds.

　　In conclusion, while it may appear paradoxical to recommend that education stress both unity and diversity, it is not- Understanding our common humanity will help us achieve a better, more peacul world. Toward the same end, we need to understand our differences in order to better tolerate them, and perhaps even appreciate them. Our schools can and should promote both kinds of understanding by way of a balanced approach.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

　　21. "The goal of business should not be to make as big a profit as possible. Instead, business should also concern itself with the well-being of the public."

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　I agree that business has some obligation to the community and society in which it operates. But should this obligation take precedence over the profit objective? My answer is no.

　　The primary reason why I agree business should have a duty to the public is that society would be worse off by exonerating business from social responsibility. Lt entirely to their own self-interest, businesses pollute the environment, withhold important product information from consumers, pay employees substandard wages, and misrepresent their financial condition to current and potential shareholders. Admittedly, in its pursuit of profit business can benit the society as well-by way of

　　more and better-paying jobs, economic growth, and better yet lower-priced products. However, this point ignores the harsh consequences-such as those listed earlier-of imposing no affirmative social duty on business,

　　Another reason why I agree business should have a duty to serve the public is that business owes such a duty. A business enters into an implied contract with the community in which it operates, under which the community agrees to permit a corporation to do business while the business implicitly promises to benit, and not harm, the community. This understanding gives rise to a number of social obligations on the part of the business-to promote consumer safety, to not harm the environmental, to treat employees and competitors fairly, and so on.

　　Although 1 agree that business should have a duty to serve the pubic, i disagree that this should be the primarily objective of business. Imposing affirmative social duties on business opens a Pandora&aposs box of problems-for example, how to determine, (1) what the public interest is in the first place, (2) which public interests are most important, (3) what actions are in the public interest, and (4) how business duty to the public might be monitored and enforced. Government regulation is the only practical way to deal with these issues, yet government is notoriously inficient and corrupt: the only way to limit these problems is to limit the duty of business to serve the public interest.

　　In sum, I agree that the duty of business should extend beyond the simple profit motive. However, its affirmative obligations to society should be tempered against the pubic benits of the profit motive and against the practical problems associated with shouldering business with an affirmative duty to ensure the public&aposs well-being.

　　22. "So long as no laws are broken, there is nothing unethical about doing whatever you need to do to promote existing products or to create new products."

　　Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.

　　The arguer asserts that in creating and marketing products, companies act ethically merely by not violating any laws. Although this position is not wholly insupportable, far more compelling arguments can be made for holding businesses to higher ethical standards than those required by the letter of the law.

　　On the one hand, two colorable arguments can be made for holding business only to legal standards of conduct. First, imposing a higher ethical duty can actual harm consumers in the long term. Compliance with high ethical standards can be costly for business, thereby lowering profits and, in turn, impeding a company&aposs ability to create jobs (for consumers), keep prices low (for consumers), and so forth. Second, limited accountability is consistent with the "buyer beware" principle that permeates our laws of contracts and torts, as well as our notion in civil procedure that plaintiffs carry the burden of proving damage. In other words, the onus should be on consumers to protect themselves, not on companies to protect consumers.

　　On the other hand, several convincing arguments can be made for holding business to a higher ethical standard. First, in many cases government regulations that protect consumers lag behind advances in technology. A new marketing technique made possible by Internet technology may be unethical but nevertheless might not be proscribed by the letter of the laws which predated the Internet. Second, enforceability might not extend beyond geographic borders, Consider, for example, the case of "dumping." When products fail to comply with U.S. regulations, American companies frequently market-or "dump" such products in third-world countries where consumer-protection laws are virtually nonexistent. Third, moral principles form the basis of government regulation arid are, therore, more fundamental than the law.

　　In the final analysis, while overburdening businesses with obligations to consumers may not be a good idea in the extreme, our regulatory system is not as fective as it should be. Therore, businesses should adhere to a higher standard of ethics in creating and marketing products than what is required by the letter of the law.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

　　23. People often give the following advice: "Be yourself. Follow your instincts and behave in a way that feels natural."

　　Do you think that, in general, this is good advice? Why or why not? Develop your point of view by giving reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading. (统一和分歧)

　　The advice to act naturally or follow one&aposs instincts can, admittedly, be helpful advice for someone torn between difficult career or personal choices in life. In most situations, however, following this advice would neither be wise nor sensible. Following one&aposs own instincts should be tempered by codes of behavior appropriate to the situation at hand.

　　&aposFirst of all, doing what comes naturally often amounts to impulsive overreaction and irrational behavior, based on emotion. Everyone experiences impulses from time to time, such as hitting another person, quitting one&aposs job, having an extramarital affair, and so forth. People, who act however they please or say whatever is on their mind without thinking about consequences especially without regard to social situation, may offend and alienate others. At the workplace, engaging in petty gossip, sexual harassment, or backstabbing might be considered "natural," yet such behavior can be destructive for the individuals at the receiving end as well as for the company. And in dealings with foreign business associates, what an American might find natural or instinctive, even if socially acceptable here, might be deeply insulting or confusing to somebody from another culture.

　　Second, doing what comes naturally is not necessarily in one&aposs own best interests. The various behaviors cited above would also tend to be counterproductive for the person engaging in them. "Natural" behavior could prove deadly to one&aposs career, since people who give little thought bore they act cannot be trusted in a job that requires fective relationships with important clients, colleagues and others.

　　Third, the speaker seems to suggest that you should be yourself, and then act accordingly in that order. But we dine ourselves in large measure by our actions. Young adults especially tack a clear sense of self. How can you be yourself if you don&apost know who you are? Even for mature adults, the process of evolving one&aposs concept of self is a perpetual one. In this respect, then, the speaker&aposs recommendation does not make much sense.

　　In sum, one should not follow the speaker&aposs advice universally or too literacy. For unless a person&aposs instincts are to follow standard rules of social and business etiquette, natural behavior can harm others as well as constrain one&aposs own personal and professional growth.

　　通过上面对gmat备考中的26篇gmat作文的范文分享，相信对于那些还在备考gmat作文的作文的人来说，可以提供一些参考信息。

　　澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

gmat作文备考之范文23篇(下)gmat作文gmat备考gmat作文gmat备考gmat备考

　　13. "The people we remember best are the ones who broke the rules. "

　　14. Although "genius" is difficult to dine, one of the qualities of genius is the ability to transcend traditional modes of thought and create new ones.

　　To sum up, I find the proposed dinition of true genius incisive and accurate; and the example of Copernicus aptly points up the two required elements of true genius required by the dinition.

澳际提示：

　　1.如何避免GMAT作文跑题

　　2.gmat作文备考之范文23篇(上)

　　3.全新记忆AA的七宗罪

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入>>>>澳际免费咨询顾问或联系QQ客服：

上123456下

共6页

阅读全文