gre argument161提纲分析汇总.

2017-08-09 作者： 27阅读

　　前段时间为gre考生汇总了gre issue写作提纲思路和分析，希望对考生在攻破gre issue写作上有所帮助。接下来的几天我们将为gre考生整理gre argument部分的提纲内容。希望通过我们的整理和汇总，让gre考生真正能掌握gre写作的精髓。

　　难易程度：★★★

　　题目题材：社会

　　gre argument 161题目：

　　In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents(1) said they prerred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study(4,5) conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book most frequently checked out(2) of each of the public libraries(6) in Leeville was the mystery novel(3). Therore, it can be concluded that the respondents in the first study had misrepresented their reading habits(7).

　　提纲：

　　(1)We do not know how many, and what kind of citizens responded to the survey, thus the representativeness of the result is open to doubt.

　　(2)The frequency of certain type of book being checked out from the public libraries is not a good indication of what kind of reading material do citizens prer.

　　(3)The author does not analyze to what extent the literary classics and mystery novels mentioned in the argument overlap.

　　(4)The author fails to provide evidence to show that the result of the follow-up study is representative of all-time reading habits of Leeville citizens.

　　(5)We do not know how long is the interim period between the two studies, many conditions may change after sufficient long time.

　　(6)The author unfairly assumes that the respondents in the first study borrow most of their reading materials from public libraries.

　　(7)The author fails to consider other explanation that could explain the discrepancy between the respondents’ answer and the result of the follow-up study, e.g. if the respondents were forthright, if they correctly understood the survey’s question, etc.

　　注：题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

　　无论是gre issue还是gre argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。