gre argument220提纲分析汇总.

2017-08-09 作者： 38阅读

　　前段时间为gre考生汇总了gre issue写作提纲思路和分析，希望对考生在攻破gre issue写作上有所帮助。接下来的几天我们将为gre考生整理gre argument部分的提纲内容。希望通过我们的整理和汇总，让gre考生真正能掌握gre写作的精髓。

　　难易程度：★★★

　　题目题材：传媒

　　gre argument 220题目：

　　The following appeared in an article in a magazine for writers.

　　"A recent study(1) showed that in describing a typical day&aposs conversation, people make an average of 23 rerences to watching television and only 1 rerence to reading fiction(4). This result suggests that, compared with the television industry, the publishing and bookselling(4) industries are likely to decline in profitability(2,3,5). Therore, people who wish to have careers as writers should acquire training and experience in writing for television rather than for print media(6)."

　　提纲：

　　(1)Without further description of the procedure of the study, the result could lend little support to the argument.

　　(2)The number of rerences to the two activities could hardly indicate the profitability of the two industries.

　　(3)The author ignores many differences between television and print media.

　　(4)The fact that people seldom rer to reading fiction does not imply that the entire publishing and bookselling industries will decline in profitability.

　　(5)Granted that the television industry is more profitable than the book-publishing industry, the assumption that television writers enjoy more secure and lucrative careers than book writers is unwarranted.

　　(6)People who wish to have careers as writers could write for media besides television and print media.

　　注：题目中括号里的数字表明这句话体现的是提纲中第几号缺陷。

　　无论是gre issue还是gre argument，考生都应该养成写提纲的习惯。这种提纲式的gre写作练习可以帮助考生锻炼写作的逻辑性，而gre写作高分最重要的得分依据就是作文的逻辑性要强。