逻辑是GMAT考试中不好掌握的部分，复习GMAT逻辑的考生需要有不错的基础。逻辑考试的题型也是多种多样的，这里重点分享的是逻辑里面的数量范围题。澳际小编下面重点给大家介绍一下，希望GMAT入门的考生能关注到：

　　GMAT考试中数量的范围是逻辑题常考，特别是MUST BE问题，混淆答案也常来于此。下面一题是LSAT，先讨论，后再公布答案及解释。

　　The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

　　Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true.

　　A). All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.

　　B). Few species of animals live on a part of the earth&aposs surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer

　　C). Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight

　　D). A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals

　　E). Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth&aposs surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not,

　　分析部分：

　　The importance of the ozone layer to terrestrial animals is that it entirely filters out some wavelengths of light but lets others through. Holes in the ozone layer and the dangers associated with these holes are well documented. However, one danger that has not been given sufficient attention is that these holes could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.

　　Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the statements above, if they are true.

　　针对文章采取的GMAT逻辑分析：

　　A). All wavelengths of sunlight that can cause eye damage are filtered out by the ozone layer where it is intact.错的原因：All wavelengths 太strong。原文只知完好的臭氧层滤掉一部分光，让一部分通过，并说通过的那部分对很多动物有害。从这点很容易误认有害的都给滤掉了。其实原文没说是否那通过的一部分是否含有有害波长。这里采用gamt考试技巧中的排除法，所以错。

　　原文问：is most strongly supported by the statements above，如果问哪个选项support 结论。A应该是个好选项。非常strong!但是因为是被原文支持，选项不能超越原文提供的范围：some wavelengths 不能推出all wavelengths，所以A错了。

　　B). Few species of animals live on a part of the earth&aposs surface that is not threatened by holes in the ozone layer错的原因：原文只说有HOLE可能会使很多动物受伤害，从这点也许可以推出有动物生活在受HOLE威胁的地方，但原文没说有没有动物生活在不受HOLE威胁的地方，故错。

　　C). Some species of animals have eyes that will not suffer any damage when exposed to unfiltered sunlight错的原因：有些人容易选这个，因为原文最后一句话说HOLE会伤害很多动物的眼睛，就是说很多动物的眼睛会受伤害，既然有很多的眼睛受伤害，就有不受伤害的。错。关键是理解原文最后一句话的many。其实相当于some ，表达的是有的概念，就是可以是1-100。相对或取非的概念为NONE。就是说它们可以包括全部100。所以有可能全部动物眼睛都会受HOLE伤害。即C可能对，也可能不对，这里采用gamt考试技巧中的排除法，不是MUST BE TRUE。故错。

　　我觉得这里不是some的原因，而是全文说could lead to severe eye damage for animals of many species.，由于是答案被原文支持，所以答案一定不能超越原文的界限，因为原文为严重伤害很多种类的眼睛，我们只能得到　：有些种类的眼睛没有被严重的伤害　可以做绝对正确的推论，但是说有些种类的眼睛根本没有被伤害　就不能是mustberight的选项了。所以该选项不能成为正确选项。

　　D). A single wavelength of sunlight can cause severe damage to the eyes of most species of animals错的原因：也是容易选错，因为原文的最后一句话加上中文对MANY和 MOST(都是很多)的理解。其实MOST(多数)是指51-100。MANY指1-100。所以不能从MANY推出MOST，从MOST倒可以推出MANY。即原文用MOST，这里采用gamt考试技巧中的排除法，D选项用MANY，则为答案。

　　E). Some wavelengths of sunlight that cause eye damage are more likely to reach the earth&aposs surface where there are holes in the ozone layer than where there are not, 从原文最后两句话可知完好的臭氧层滤掉了部分有害的光线，则说明有洞时，有害的光线更易到达地球。故对。

　　最后给GMAT入门生强调一点该问题虽然是MOST STRONGLY SUPPORTED，但不会出现两个能从原文MUST BE得出的答案，因为该题归为MUST BE TRUE题型，当然不存在支持的程度问题。

　　这就是小编分享的GMAT考试逻辑部分的数量范围题，希望考生们复习GMAT逻辑的时候能认真对待。复习准备逻辑还是希望GMAT入门的考生一开始就好好准备，打好基础才是王道。

澳际六步曲服务体系由六大步骤和36项子模块组成，核心内容包括留学理性规划和背景提升、考试个性化辅导、文书创作和学校申请、套磁和面试、签证辅导及后期服务、海内外求职。澳际六步曲体系贯穿澳际所有服务项目：美国名校本科申请，名校硕士申请，博士奖学金申请，TOP 20 MBA精英申请，英国/加拿大TOP 10申请等。澳际六步曲服务体系适合人群：适合现在高一、高二、大一、大二和大三的学生，希望自己未雨绸缪，从根本上提升申请竞争力，从而于毕业之际成功步入世界名校。详细了解澳际六步曲：www.aoji.cn

更多出国留学最新动态，敬请关注澳际教育手机端网站，并可拨打咨询热线：400-601-0022