以下是2011年12月的GMAT作文AA部分机经更新，更新日期从12月1日起至12月16日，目前共43题。澳际留学祝大家GMAT考试顺利!

　　39. V1 by AA: Apex Manufacturing 给managers的家里买电脑和报销电话费 这样他们就能get access from home to公司的电脑和数据 结果去年公司的productivity就增加了 所以其他公司也应该借鉴Apex的经验 给employees也买电脑和支付电话费

　　JJ里木有 我这里看应该是第94题 实在不想打字了 大家自己对应题号看看就好哈

　　V2 by shixinhui AA Apex company bought computer for managers and paid for telephone call so that the productivity enhanced 貌似题库里有

　　V3 by Cranespring AA 一个杂志上的文章 作者说了 有个公司给managers配家用电脑 还给报销电话费 so that 他们可以在家里 在工作以外的时间 处理各种工作神码的 后来 公司的利润增加了这个二B青年作者就建议别的公司都这么干

　　考古：

　　原题：97. The following appeared as part of an article in a computer magazine.

　　”A year ago Apex Manufacturing bought its managers computers for their homes and paid for telephone connections so that the managers could access Apex computers and data files from home after normal business hours. Since last year, productivity at Apex has increased by 15 percent. Other companies can learn from the success at Apex: given home computers and access to company resources, employees will work additional hours at home and thereby increase company profits.”

　　一年前Apex制造公司给它的经理们在家买了电脑，并支付电话费，这样他们就可以在工作时间以外从家里连接到Apex的电脑和数据文件。从去年开始，Apex的生产能力增长了15%。其他公司可以借鉴Apex的成功，提供家用电脑和到公司资源的链接，雇员会在家里加班并提高公司利润。

　　思路：

　　Notice that only managers were bought computers by Apex, whose productivity indeed rose 15 percent as the result. It is different from the assumption made in the article, which stated that if all employees were brought computers, they would work extra hours at home. Managers ≠ all employees

　　A. This argument suffers from a fallacy of post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

　　B. Next, the author fails to provide any evidence that installing home computers for managers really led to the increase of Apex’s productivity.

　　* home access 和increase productivity因果关系错误

　　* 就算有关系，productity增加也不代表profits会增加

　　* 就算以上都对，用去年来推今后也是错的

　　* hasty generalization。有两个，一是把apex推广到所有公司，二是把managers推广到了所有employees

　　范文：

　　In this article the author attributes Apex Manufacturing’s 15 percent increase in productivity over the past year to its decision to equip its manager with computers and paid telephone connections for their homes so that they would access company computers and files from home after normal business hours. On the basis of Apex’s experience the author recommends that other companies follow Apex’s example and provide computers and access to company resources to their employees. The author believes that such a policy would increase productivity and profits for other companies, just as it did for Apex. The author’s line of reasoning is questionable for several reasons.

　　First, the author assumes that Apex’s increase in productivity is due to its equipping its managers with home computers and access to company resources. However, the only evidence offered in support of this claim is the fact that Apex’s increase in productivity occurred after the home computers and after-hours (adv. 工作完毕后) access was provided. Unfortunately, this evidence is insufficient to establish the causal claim in question. While temporal precedence is one of the conditions required to establish a causal relationship between two events, by itself it is not a sufficient condition. Consequently, it is possible that Apex’s increase in productivity is not related to its decision to equip its managers with computers and after-hours access in the fashion required by the author’s argument.

　　Second, the author assumes that Apex and other companies are sufficiently similar to warrant a conclusion based on an analogy between them. Even if we accept the view that Apex’s increase in productivity was brought about by its policy of enabling its managers to work from home, differences between Apex and other companies could nullify this result. Lacking detailed information about Apex and the other companies in question it is difficult to assess the author’s conclusion.

　　In conclusion, the author’s argument is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author would have to provide additional evidence for the claim that Apex’s decision to provide its managers with home computers and access to company resources was responsible for its increase in productivity. Furthermore, it would be necessary to show that Apex and other companies are sufficiently similar to justify the analogy between them.

　　以上就是12月16日更新的GMAT作文机经AA部分，考生可以适当借鉴，并通过练习来掌握GMAT作文的解题规律，从而顺利通过GMAT考试。 相关链接：

1.GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 12月16日更新（三十八）

2.GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 12月16日更新（三十七）

3.GMAT考试作文机经AA部分 12月16日更新（三十六）

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入 >>>>有问题?找免费的澳际专家咨询! 或联系QQ客服： ，也可以通过在线咨询处留言，把您最关心的问题告诉我们。

更多出国留学最新动态，敬请关注澳际教育手机端网站，并可拨打咨询热线：400-601-0022