GMAT考试已于12月27日更换题库，以下是2011年12月的GMAT作文AI部分机经更新，更新日期从11年12月27日起至12年1月11日，目前共39题。澳际留学祝大家GMAT考试顺利!

　　19. v1杨yy:还有另一个ISSUE是公司要不要直到recommendation变成法律之后采取改变产品和生产流程。

　　V2. amysw:Scientists often change the standards 哪些东西对environment好(或不好)。companies就要根据recommendation来change products and processes。现在他们决定等政府出台regulation之后再change。

　　V3. hechaoo: 由于科学家制定的标准(standard)变化很快，所以企业不要改变自己产品的标准，除非它变成了government 的regulations.

　　V4. bushion : 科学家不断定义环保标准，公司要resist changing 直到国家标准出台之类的。

　　V5. linchaoyi : 因为科学家老是换环保的概念，所以公司们不要跟着这些发现改变自己的products和processes，除非政府颁布规章制度。。。。。

　　考古：

　　原题：No.42 Scientists are continually redining the standards for what is benicial or harmful to the environment. Since these standards keep shifting, companies should resist changing their products and processes in response to each new recommendation until those recommendations become government regulations.”

　　“科学家在不断重新制定对环境什么是有利的，什么是有害的的标准。由于这些标准不停变动，面对新建议，公司应该保持他们的产品和流程不变直到新的建议成为国家标准为止。”

　　思路：

　　* 科学家的建议也并不一定都是正确的。很有可能他的结论适用面很窄。或者他所得到的数据有错误等等。

　　* 对企业来说频繁的变更产品和生产流程会造成很大的经济损失

　　* 诚然等待国家制定标准很可能存在滞后等问题但是比较起来以上的问题还是应该等待国家制定标准。此外一个折中的方案是国家成立专门的机构快速地对新的方案和建议做出评价并迅速制定标准

　　范文：

　　The speaker argues that because scientists continually shift viewpoints about how our actions affect the natural environment, companies should not change their products and processes according to scientific recommendations until the government requires them to do so. This argument raises complex issues about the duties of business and aboutregulatory fairness and fectiveness. Although a wait-and-see policy may help companies avoid costly and unnecessary changes, three countervailing considerations compel me to disagree overall with the argument.

　　First, a regulatory system of environmental protection might not operate equitably. At first glance, a wait-and-see response might seem fair in that all companies would be subject to the same standards and same enforcement measures. However, enforcement requires detection, and while some violators may be caught, others might not. Moreover, a broad regulatory system imposes general standards that may not apply equitably to every company. Suppose, for example, that pollution from a company in a valley does more damage to the environment than similar pollution from a company>in the extreme, to shut down the operation if the company cannot afford abatement measures.

　　Secondly, the argument assumes that the government regulations will properly rlect scientific recommendations. However, this claim is somewhat dubious. Companies with the most money and political influence, not the scientists, might in some cases dictate regulatory standards. In other words, legislators may be more influenced by political expediency and campaign pork than by societal concerns.

　　Thirdly, waiting until government regulations are in place can have disastrous fects>EPAmight be overburdened with its detection and enforcement duties, thereby allowing continued environmental damage by companies who have not yet been caught or who appeal penalties.

　　In conclusion, despite uncertainty within the scientific community about what environmental standards are best, companies should not wait for government regulation bore reacting to warnings about environmental problems. The speaker’s recommended approach would in many cases operate inequitably among companies: moreover, it ignores the political-corruption factor as well as the potential environmental damage resulting from bureaucratic delay.

　　以上就是2012年1月11日更新的GMAT作文机经AI部分，考生可以适当借鉴，并通过练习来掌握GMAT作文的解题规律，从而顺利通过GMAT考试。 相关链接：

1.GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 12年1月11日更新(十一)

2.GMAT考试作文机经AI部分 12年1月11日更新(四)

3.GMAT作文备考策略解析

想要获得更多咨询服务点击进入 >>>>有问题?找免费的澳际专家咨询! 或联系QQ客服： ，也可以通过在线咨询处留言，把您最关心的问题告诉我们。

更多出国留学最新动态，敬请关注澳际教育手机端网站，并可拨打咨询热线：400-601-0022