GMAT考试已于2012年7月10日更换题库，以下是2012年7月的GMAT作文机经更新，更新日期从12年7月11日开始，澳际留学小编会为您送上最新的机经的，希望大家多多关注本频道。在此澳际留学祝大家GMAT考试顺利!更多相关问题可咨询澳际留学在线专家，如果有任何意见和建议，也请联系我们。

　　11(2次)

　　原始寂静：

　　V1(BY: yuanyuanblue) 一个杂货店增加了pharmercy sector，sales提高，所以管理层猜测观众想要的是方便，所以扩大产品线会增大profit,计划增加clothes section and resteraunt,变成大而全的百货有助于增强区域里的competive advantage.

　　原题：

　　The following is part of a business plan created by the management of the Megamart grocery store.

　　“Our total sales have increased this year by 20 percent since we added a pharmacy section to our grocery store. Clearly, the customer’s main concern is the convenience afforded by one-stop shopping. The surest way to increase our profits over the next couple of years, therore, is to add a clothing department along with an automotive supplies and repair shop. We should also plan to continue adding new departments and services, such as a restaurant and a garden shop, in subsequent years. Being the only store in the area that offers such a range of services will give us a competitive advantage over other local stores.”

　　Megamart杂货店的管理层的商务计划：

　　由于我们在杂货店内加了药剂销售部分，今年我们的总体销售额增加了20%。显然，顾客主要关注的是一次性购物的便利性。在今后两年内提高我们的利润的最佳方法是增加一个成衣部门和一个汽车配件和维修商店。我们同时也应该在最后的几年中继续增加新的部门和服务，比如餐馆，园艺商店。成为本地唯一的提供如此广泛服务的商店将给我们带来超越其他商店的竞争优势。

　　参考思路：

　　1. 无因果联系：文章并没有说药剂销售部分与总销售额的因果关系

　　2. False analogy：药剂销售与汽车配件、维修店类比

　　3. All things are equal : 今年的销售增加纵向错误类比今后两年销量会增加

　　4. Gratuitous assumption：无端假设销售额增加是因为顾客关注一次性购物便利

　　参考范文：

　　The management of the Megamart grocery store concludes that adding new departments and services is the surest way to increase profits over the next couple of years. They are led to this conclusion because of a 20 percent increase in total sates, realized after the addition of a pharmacy section to the grocery store. On the basis of this experience, they concluded that the convenience of one-stop shopping was the main concern of their customers. The management’s argument is faulty in several respects.

　　In the first place, the management assumes that the increase in total sales was due to the addition of the pharmacy section. However, the only evidence offered to support this conclusion is the fact that the addition of the pharmacy preceded the increase in sales. But the mere fact that the pharmacy section was added bore the increase occurred is insufficient grounds to conclude that it was responsible for the increase. Many other factors could bring about this same result. Lacking a detailed analysis of the source of the sales increase, it would be sheer folly to attribute the increase to the addition of the pharmacy section.

　　In the second place, even if it were the case that the increase in total sales was due to the addition of the pharmacy section, this fact alone is insufficient to support the claim that adding additional departments will increase sales even further. It is quite possible that the addition of the pharmacy section increased sales simply because there was no other pharmacy in the vicinity. The additional proposed departments and services, on the other hand, might be well represented in the area and their addition might have no impact whatsoever on the profits of the store. In other words, there may be relevant differences between the pharmacy section and the additional proposed sections that preclude them from having a similar fect on the sales of the store.

　　In conclusion, the management’s argument is not well-reasoned. To strengthen the conclusion, the management must provide additional evidence linking the addition of the pharmacy section to the increase in total sales. It must also show that there are no exceptional reasons for the sales increase due to the pharmacy section that would not apply to the other proposed additions.

　相关链接：

1.GMAT作文点评与分析(十)

2.GMAT考试作文机经 7月10日更新（九）

3.770分考生GMAT作文感想

更多出国留学最新动态，敬请关注澳际教育手机端网站，并可拨打咨询热线：400-601-0022