GRE范文:如何看待电视语言审查.

2017-08-09 作者: 61阅读

  [题目]

  In some countries, television and radio programs are carully censored for offensive language and behavior. In other countries, there is little or no censorship.

  [参考答案]

  The censorship and regulation of broadcast media for offensive material involves a conflict between the freedom of expression and the duty of government to protect its citizenry from potential harm. I believe that our societal interest in preventing the harm that exposure to obscenity produces takes precedence over the freedoms of individual broadcasters.

  Firstly, I believe exposure to obscene and offensive language and behavior causes people to mimic such behavior. There is anecdotal and scientific evidence to support this contention.

  Secondly, I believe that obscene and offensive behavior is damaging to a society. It weakens moral character and weakens human relationships and it promotes a tendency toward immoral and antisocial behavior. These fects weaken the civil cords that hold a democratic society together.

  Some argue for that free speech is the basis of a democratic society. However, the founding fathers never intended the constitution to mean an unrestricted license to wanton profanity. Advocates of free expression might also point out difficulties in dining "obscene" or "offensive" language or behavior. But, however difficult it may be to agree on standards, the fort is benicial insofar as it helps to maintain the civil cords of a democratic society.

  In conclusion, government should take a role in regulating speech, but only speech that is patently offensive. Regulation of media may infringe on freedom of speech, but it is worthwhile if it can restrict the exposure of damaging offensive material.

留学咨询

更多出国留学最新动态,敬请关注澳际教育手机端网站,并可拨打咨询热线:400-601-0022
  • 专家推荐
  • 成功案例
  • 博文推荐
  • 留学语言学习广告越响亮,实力越强大?

    2269人阅读 查看原文

  • 来来来,别让语言成为你留学的最后一道坎(英日韩德法)

    2176人阅读 查看原文

  • 雅思第二部分口语话题(地点类)

    2507人阅读 查看原文

  • 为什么你的托福听力拿不到高分?

    2009人阅读 查看原文

我要查

澳际服务

我要读

热门国家申请